4.7 Article

Molecular simulation of coal-fired plant flue gas competitive adsorption and diffusion on coal

期刊

FUEL
卷 239, 期 -, 页码 87-96

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.11.011

关键词

Flue gas; Goaf; CO2 storage; Competitive adsorption; Diffusion coefficient

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51174108, 51774172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Better understanding the microcosmic mechanism of CO2, O-2, and N-2 competitive adsorption can benefit the effective CO2 storage and fire prevention by injecting coal-fired flue gas into the goaf. Toward this aim, macromolecular coal model was established. Grand Canonical Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics simulation were carried out at single, binary, and ternary component systems under the conditions of 298.15-318.15 K and up to 10000 kPa. Simulation results demonstrate that the absolute adsorption amount decreases with the increase of temperature and water content in coal, and increases with the pressure increasing and corresponding bulk mole fraction. The competitiveness is CO2 > O-2 > N-2 basing on the ternary adsorption selectivity of CO2/O-2 (5.6-24.2), CO2/N-2 (8.4-29.3), and O-2/N-2 (1.2-1.5). The isosteric adsorption heat of CO2 (about 29.1-30.9 kJ/ mol) is nearly double of O-2 or N-2 (about 16.6-17.3 kJ/mol), and CO2 occupies stronger adsorption sites without being affected by O-2 or N-2. The interaction energy between CO2 and coal is greater than O-2 or N-2 due to the electrostatic energy and much larger van der Waals energy. The adsorbed molecules swell the coal and the trend of self-diffusion coefficients with pressure is consistent with loading and volumes. So the flue gas injecting into the goaf is better than pure N-2, and can store large amounts of CO2 (0.406 mmol/g), meanwhile inhibit the coal spontaneous combustion, visually displayed by density distributions. The findings provide essential evidence for injection parameters such as temperature, pressure, gas concentration, injectivity, moisture, and so on.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据