4.7 Article

Synthesis of prebiotic galactooligosaccharides from lactose and lactulose by dairy propionibacteria

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 93-105

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.08.014

关键词

Propionibacteria; beta-galactosidase; Transgalactosylation; Oligosaccharides; Prebiotics

资金

  1. ANPCyT (Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, Argentina) [PICT 2014-3583]
  2. CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Espana) [I-COOP_2014_COOPB20099, EMHE-CSIC 2017 MHE-200047]
  3. MICINN [AGL2017-84614-C2-1-R]
  4. Spanish MECD [FPU14/03619]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential of probiotic bacteria to produce prebiotic oligosaccharides by transgalactosylation has been minimally studied. In this work, we screened the beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) activity of dairy propionibacteria (PAB) isolated from Argentinean foods to select strains for the synthesis of oligosaccharides from lactose (GOS) and lactulose (OsLu). PAB, when grown in a medium with lactose as a carbon source, were disrupted, and the cell-free extracts were assayed for beta-gal activity. Nine strains grew on lactose and showed beta-gal activities from 0.27 to 2.60 U mL(-1). Propionibacterium acidipropionici LET 120, the strain with the highest activity, was able to synthesize, using 30% lactose and lactulose at pH 6.5 and 45 degrees C, 26.8% of LET 120-GOS and 26.1% of LET 120-OsLu after 24 h. When they were tested as carbon sources for growth, P. acidipropionici LET 120 attained higher biomasses, mu(max) and beta-gal activities at the expense of Aspergillus oryzae-OsLu, Vivinal (R)-GOS and lactulose compared to lactose or glucose. In addition, LET 120-GOS and LET 120-OsLu synthesized by PAB were prebiotic for some probiotic strains. For the first time, our results show the production of GOS and OsLu by dairy PAB, and these results encourage further studies on the optimization of the synthesis and structure characterization of the obtained oligosaccharides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据