4.7 Article

Non-destructive Raman spectroscopy as a tool for measuring ASTA color values and Sudan I content in paprika powder

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 187-193

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.129

关键词

Raman spectroscopy; ASTA values; Sudan I; Partial least-squares regression; Partial least-squares - discriminant-analysis

资金

  1. Junta de Extremadura [FQM003, IB16058, Ayuda GR18041]
  2. Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad of Spain [CTQ2017-82496-P]
  3. European Social funds
  4. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte of Spain [279, FPU13/00249, EST16/00333]
  5. Norwegian Agricultural Food Research Foundation (Oslo, Norway) [262308/F40]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was developing a non-destructive method for the determination of color in paprika powder as well as for detecting possible adulteration with Sudan I. Non-destructive Raman spectroscopy was applied directly to paprika powder employing a laser excitation of 785 nm for the first time. The fluorescence background was estimated, by fitting a polynomial to each spectrum, and then subtracted. After preprocessing the spectra, some peaks were clearly identified as characteristic from pigments present in paprika. The preprocessed Raman spectra were correlated with the ASTA color values of paprika by partial least squares regression (PLSR). Twenty-five paprika samples were adulterated with Sudan I at different levels and the PLSR model was also obtained. The coefficients of determination (R-2) were 0.945 and 0.982 for ASTA and Sudan I concentration, respectively, and the root mean square errors of prediction (RMSEP) were 8.8 ASTA values and 0.91 mg/g, respectively. Finally, different approaches were applied to discriminate between adulterated and non-adulterated samples. Best results were obtained for partial least squares - discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), allowing a good discrimination when the adulteration with Sudan I was higher than 0.5%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据