4.7 Review

Presence of unreported carcinogens, Aflatoxins and their hydroxylated metabolites, in industrialized Oaxaca cheese from Mexico City

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 128-138

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.11.046

关键词

Aflatoxins; Cheese contamination; Food carcinogens

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aflatoxins (AFs) are toxic secondary metabolites of the fungi Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus and A. nomius. The fungi produce these AFs in cereals, oilseeds and spices. AFs have damaging effects on all organisms, including humans, and their symptoms can be classified as acute (vomiting, hemorrhage and death) or chronic (immunodepression, Reye syndrome, Kwashiorkor, teratogenesis, hepatitis, cirrhosis, and various cancers). Basic AFs (AFB(1), AFB(2), AFG(1), and AFG(2)) are metabolized in the liver or by microbes that produce hydroxylated metabolites (AFM(1), AFM(2), and AFP(1)) and aflatoxicol (AFL), soluble in water and easy to dispose. Thus, AFs can be excreted in fluids, such as milk. AFs are not destroyed in the process of making cheese. The purpose of this study was to identify and quantify the AFs present in 30 samples of industrialized Oaxaca-type cheese sold in Mexico City. The average concentrations of AFs detected in the 30 samples of industrialized cheese were as follows: AFB(1) (0.1 mu g kg(-1)) in 20% (6/30); a trace amount of AFB(2) (0.01 < LOD) in only 3% (1/30); AFG(1) (0.14 mu g kg(-1)) in 10% (3/30); AFG(2) (0.6 mu g kg(-1)) in 30% (9/30); AFM(1) (1.7 mu g kg(-1)) in 57% (17/30); AFP(1) (0.03% mu g kg(-1)) in 3% (1/30); and AFL (13.1 mu g kg(-1)) in 97% (29/30). AFB(1) and AFL were the most abundant aflatoxins in Oaxaca-type cheese. However, eight aflatoxins were present, contributing an average of 15.7 mu g kg(-1) AFs distributed among the 30 samples. The risk assessment analysis showed that there was no substantial risk for cancer due to AFs in industrialized Oaxaca cheese from Mexico City.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据