4.5 Article

A new approach for downstream purification of rhamnolipid biosurfactants

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 122-131

出版社

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2018.12.003

关键词

Downstream processing; Rhamnolipids; Solvent extraction; Calcium precipitation; Alcohol precipitation; Fermentation

资金

  1. Ohio Soybean Council [15-2-09, 16-R-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Downstream purification processes often determine the manufacturing costs of biotechnological products, particularly for those with high yields in the upstream synthesis processes. Rhamnolipids are important biosurfactants with promising industrial applications. Significant research has been focused on optimizing rhamnolipid production in the upstream fermentation but there are very few studies on downstream processing. The objective of this study is to fill this critical technological gap by (1) tracking the recovery and purity of rhamnolipids processed through different unit operations and (2) developing new and more environmentally friendly downstream processing methods. A biopolymer removal step using alcohol precipitation was found effective in improving the recovery, from 66% to 78%, and giving about 87% purity in the product collected by acid precipitation without further solvent extraction. A reverse aqueous extraction method, which was optimized to recover 97% rhamnolipids from the solvent (ethyl acetate) extract, was examined as an alternative to the commonly used but costly, energy-intensive solvent vaporization. As a polishing step, calcium precipitation was optimized to selectively remove residual impurities while keeping all major rhamnolipid congeners in solution. The study also identified the presence of excess oil substrate/derivatives in the fermentation broth as a strongly negative factor to the downstream processing. The feeding strategy of oil substrate in fermentation should be carefully designed. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据