4.3 Review

Oncolytic adenoviruses: a game changer approach in the battle between cancer and the immune system.

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 443-455

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1595582

关键词

Immunovirotherapy; oncolytic adenovirus; viral vectors; adoptive-cell transfer; CAR T cell therapy; TCR gene therapy; checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapy

资金

  1. Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation
  2. HUCH Research Funds (EVO)
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Finnish Cancer Organizations
  5. University of Helsinki
  6. TILT Biotherapeutics Ltd
  7. European Commission Marie Curie Innovative Training Network (ITN) grant VIRION (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2014) [643130]
  8. University of Helsinki Doctoral Programme in Clinical Research
  9. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [643130] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Oncolytic adenoviruses are among the most studied oncolytic viruses because of their tumor selectivity, safety, and transgene-delivery capability. With a growing number of different immunotherapies against cancer, the extraordinary immunogenicity of the adenovirus has emerged as a differentiating strength. Enabling T-cell related therapies with oncolytic adenoviruses appears a promising approach due to its inherent ability to elicit responses from the adaptive immune compartment. Areas covered: These viruses have successfully enhanced both adoptive T-cell therapies and immune-checkpoint therapies. Oncolytic viruses induce several effects at the tumor and on the systemic level that help to circumvent current limitations of T-cells and related therapies, such as T-cell trafficking, tumor immune suppressivity and antigen spreading. Expert opinion: Taking into account the multitude of possibilities of treating cancer with immunotherapies, learning to optimize the combinations and administration strategies of these drugs, could lead to durable responses in patients with currently incurable cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据