4.7 Article

Application of deep learning to the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis from thyroid cancer with CT

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 5452-5457

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06098-8

关键词

Artificial intelligence; Lymphatic metastasis; Thyroid cancer; Multidetector computed tomography

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1C1B5016217]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1C1B5016217] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To develop a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for use in the CT diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with thyroid cancer. Methods A total of 995 axial CT images that included benign (n = 647) and malignant (n = 348) lymph nodes were collected from 202 patients with thyroid cancer who underwent CT for surgical planning between July 2017 and January 2018. The datasets were randomly split into training (79.0%), validation (10.5%), and test (10.5%) datasets. Eight deep convolutional neural network (CNN) models were used to classify the images into metastatic or benign lymph nodes. Pretrained networks were used on the ImageNet and the best-performing algorithm was selected. Class-specific discriminative regions were visualized with attention heatmap using a global average pooling method. Results The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for the tested algorithms ranged from 0.909 to 0.953. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the best-performing algorithm were all 90.4%, respectively. Attention heatmap highlighted important subregions for further clinical review. Conclusion A deep learning-based CAD system could accurately classify cervical LNM in patients with thyroid cancer on preoperative CT with an AUROC of 0.953. Whether this approach has clinical utility will require evaluation in a clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据