期刊
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 229-238出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024
关键词
Ecosystem services; Structured decision-making; Objectives; Management actions; Trade-offs
资金
- Ministry of Education from the Chilean Government fellowship
- University of Queensland Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Integrative Natural Resource Management Postgraduate Fellowship
- ARC Future Fellowship
- Laureate Schemes
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence
- National Environmental Research Program Hub
- CSIROs Agriculture Flagship
Numerous assessments have quantified, mapped, and valued the services provided by ecosystems that are important for human wellbeing. However, much of the literature does not clarify how the information gathered in such assessments could be used to inform decisions that will impact ecosystem services. We propose that the process of making management decisions for ecosystem services comprises five core steps: identification of the problem and its social-ecological context; specification of objectives and associated performance measures; defining alternative management actions and evaluating the consequences of these actions; assessment of trade-offs and prioritization of alternative management actions; and making management decisions. We synthesize the degree to which the peer-reviewed ecosystem services literature has captured these steps. For the ecosystem service paradigm to gain traction in science and policy arenas, future ecosystem service assessments should have clearly articulated objectives, seek to evaluate the consequences of alternative management actions, and facilitate closer engagement between scientists and stakeholders. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据