4.5 Article

Effects of adult enriched environment on cognition, hippocampal-prefrontal plasticity and NMDAR subunit expression in MK-801-induced schizophrenia model

期刊

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 590-600

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.03.009

关键词

Neurodevelopmental disorder; Spatial learning; Associative memory; Electrophysiology; Glutamate receptor

资金

  1. University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU [UFI 11/32, EHU 14/33, PPG 17/51]
  2. Basque Government [GIC IT 901/16, IT 747/13]
  3. Spanish Government [SAF2016-77758-R]
  4. Spanish Government (AEI/FEDER, UE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized by psychosis, negative symptoms and cognitive impairment. Cognitive deficits are enduring and represent the most disabling symptom but are currently poorly treated. N-methyl D -aspartate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction hypothesis has been notably successful in explaining the pathophysiological findings and symptomatology of schizophrenia. Thereby, NMDAR blockade in rodents represents a useful tool to identify new therapeutic approaches. In this regard, enriched environment (EE) could play an essential role. Using a multilevel approach of behavior, electrophysiology and protein analysis, we showed that a short-term exposure to EE in adulthood ameliorated spatial learning and object-place associative memory impairment observed in postnatally MK-801-treated Long Evans rats. Moreover, EE in adult life restored long-term potentiation (LTP) in hippocampal-medial prefrontal pathway abolished by MK-801 treatment. EE in adulthood also induced a set of modifications in the expression of proteins related to glutamatergic neurotransmission. Taken together, these findings shed new light on the neurobiological effects of EE to reverse the actions of MK-801 and offer a preclinical testing of a therapeutic strategy that may be remarkably effective for managing cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据