4.5 Article

A prospective comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and 51Cr-EDTA clearance for glomerular filtration rate measurement in 42 kidney transplant recipients

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 209-215

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.002

关键词

Functional MRI; Kidney transplant; Glomerular filtration rate; Data accuracy

资金

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-10-LABX-57]
  2. French State [ANR-10-IDEX-03-02]
  3. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux [AOI-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) compared with the reference standard technique of urinary clearance of Cr-51-EDTA. Patients and methods: All kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with an indication for non-urgent contrast-enhanced MRI at our institution were prospectively included between 2008 and 2012. Renographies were acquired by low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) then fitted with a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. MR-GFR was compared with reference isotopic measurements using Bland-Altman diagrams, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance rates. Results: Forty-two KTRs (mean age 51.5 years, 26-74) were analyzed. Mean estimated GFR was 48.5 +/- 27 mL/min/1.73m(2) (24-178 mL/min). The mean bias was + 13.2 mL/min (6.4-20.0, +36.9%) ranging from -31.0 mL/min (-41.7%) to + 101.4 mL/min (+89.2%) with a large variability (standard-deviation: 22.3 mL/min; limits of agreement: [-30.6 (-43.3-18.9); + 57.0 (45.3-68.7)]). The ICC was 0.32 (0.02-0.56) and the concordance rate was 28.6% (14.9-42.2). Conclusions: The large variability of MR-GFR compared with the reference technique precludes its use in KTRs, whose anatomical peculiarities make standardization of arterial input function (AIF) difficult.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据