4.4 Article

Genetic diversity and differentiation of introduced red oak (Quercus rubra) in Germany in comparison with reference native North American populations

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 138, 期 2, 页码 275-285

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-019-01167-5

关键词

Chloroplast microsatellites; cpSSRs; Quercus rubra; Haplotype diversity; Origin; Provenances

类别

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture [22023314]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) was introduced to Europe in the late seventeenth century and has since become the most important deciduous non-native tree species in Germany. Despite its importance, little is known about the origin and patterns of genetic variation in German red oak stands. To be able to make recommendations regarding the adaptive potential of red oak stands, which might be related to their origin and the selection of provenances, with respect to climate change, a better understanding of the genetic diversity and structure of German red oak stands is needed. Individuals from 62 populations in Germany and North America were genotyped at five chloroplast microsatellite loci to characterize chloroplast haplotype diversity and geographic structure. Compared to reference populations from the natural distribution range, German red oak stands demonstrated a relatively low genetic differentiation among populations and represented only a fraction of the haplotype diversity found in North America. For several stands located in southern Germany, considerably higher haplotype diversity than in other German stands was found. While most German stands showed signatures of founder effects, the diversity of stands in southern Germany might have been increased due to admixture and multiple introductions of different North American provenances. Overall, we conclude that German stands originated from a limited geographic area, possibly located in the northern part of the native distribution range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据