4.4 Article

Employing magnetism of Fe3O4and hydrophilicity of ZrO2to mitigate biofouling in magnetic MBR by Fe3O4-coated ZrO2/PAN nanocomposite membrane

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 41, 期 20, 页码 2683-2704

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2019.1579870

关键词

Fe3O4@ZrO(2)nanoparticles; magnetic nanocomposite membranes; hydrophilic nanocomposite membranes; magnetic-assisted membrane bioreactor; biofouling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this research is benefiting from the synergistic effect of the simultaneous presence of Fe(3)O(4)and ZrO(2)in the form of Fe3O4-coated ZrO2(Fe3O4@ZrO2) nanoparticles within the structure of PAN membrane to reduce membrane fouling. The role of Fe(3)O(4)nanoparticles in increasing the pore size and magnetic saturation as well as the role of ZrO(2)in decreasing surface roughness and hydrophobicity can mitigate membrane fouling in magnetic-assisted membrane bioreactors. For this purpose, Fe3O4, ZrO2, and Fe3O4@ZrO(2)nanoparticles were embedded into PAN membrane structure and magnetic (MnM), hydrophilic (HnM), and magnetic-hydrophilic (HMnM) membranes were synthesized.H1M (1ZrO(2)/PAN) membrane with a contact angle of 31 degrees,M1N (1Fe(3)O(4)/PAN) with a pore size of 90 nm, andH(3)M (3ZrO(2)/PAN) membrane with an RMS roughness of 13.5 nm were the most hydrophilic, porous, and smoothest membranes, respectively. High sensitivity to magnetic field along with high porosity, high hydrophilicity and low surface roughness simultaneously exist within the structure ofMHMs membranes, such thatMH(1)M (1Fe(3)O(4)@ZrO2/PAN) indicated 116% greater flux, 121% greater flux recovery, and 85% less total filtration resistance in comparison with the blank membrane in magnetic membrane bioreactor, at a magnetic field intensity of 120 mT and MLSS = 10,000 mg/l. As an overall conclusion, the output of this research was compared with other research in term of normalized flux. Results reveal that at MLSS = 10,000 mg/l, HRT = 8 h and TMP = 0.3 bar,MH1M membrane has normalized flux equal to 1.56 g/m(2) h bar which is an acceptable value compared to normalized flux reported by other researchers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据