4.7 Review

A systematic review of global legal regulations on the permissible level of heavy metals in cosmetics with particular emphasis on skin lightening products

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 187-193

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.029

关键词

Skin lightening preparations; Skin pigmentation; Vulnerable populations; Heavy metals; Legislation and jurisprudence

资金

  1. Transdisciplinary Center on Health Effects of Early Environmental Exposures P30 Core Center at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai [P30ES023515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is an urgent need to address the safety problems caused by the use of skin lightening cosmetics. Evidence suggests that some of them may contain heavy metals. Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of global legal regulations regarding the permissible level of mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium in cosmetic products, with particular emphasis on skin lightening preparations. Methods: The systematic search of documents was a two-stage process. First, official websites of 17 regional organizations and subsequently regulations for countries with a population over 100 million were searched. Results: Fifteen legislative acts, encompassing more than 67.2% of the global population were reviewed. Regulations were identified for 44/59 high income countries, 16/55 upper middle income countries, 9/45 lower income countries, 0/34 low income countries. The median adult literacy rate was 91.4% and 64.2% in countries with and without regulations, respectively. The use of mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium has been banned in 67, 67, 65, and 65 out of 69 countries, respectively. Conclusions: While regulations exist in most of the high income countries, in low income countries there is a lack of similar standards. In most countries for which these legal regulations have been identified, restrictions on the permissible level of heavy metals are strict. There is a need for enforcement of existing rules, and rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of these regulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据