4.7 Article

Modelling degradation kinetics of metformin and guanylurea in soil microcosms to derive degradation end-points

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 735-745

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.045

关键词

Metformin; Guanylurea; Biodegradation in soil; Biodegradation kinetics; Modelling

资金

  1. University of Auckland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degradation of metformin (MET) and guanylurea (GUA) fortified separately in freshly collected two top soils (0-10 cm) from New Zealand's pastoral region was studied under controlled laboratory conditions. Incubation studies were carried at 30 degrees C under aerobic conditions at 60% of maximum water holding capacity and at two (0.5 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg) nominal soil concentrations. Degradation profiles revealed a bi-phasic pattern of both the compounds with an initial rapid degradation followed by slow dissipation rate, resulting in poor fits by simple first order kinetics. However, the use of three non-linear mathematical models sufficiently described the measured data and well supported by an array of statistical indices to judge model's ability to fit the measured datasets. Further evaluation using box-whisker plots showed that double first-order in parallel (DFOP) and first-order two-compartment (FOTC) models best fitted the data points followed by the Bi-exponential (BEXP) model. Mechanistic assumptions from DFOP and FOTC suggest that degradation of MET and GUA proceeds at two different rates, possibly in two compartments. The calculated DT50 using both models were in the range of 2.7-15.5 days and 0.9-4 days, while 90% dissipation time (DT90) varied between 91 and 123 days and 44 and 137 days for MET and GUA, respectively. Degradation of both compounds were dependent on soil types and properties, incubation conditions and initial substrate concentration. Formation of GUA with decrease in MET concentration over time confirmed that GUA is a transformation product concomitantly formed from aerobic degradation of MET in soil. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据