4.6 Article

Guttation capsules containing hydrogen peroxide: an evolutionarily conserved NADPH oxidase gains a role in wars between related fungi

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 2644-2658

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14575

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) to ISD [P25613-B20] Funding Source: Medline
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M802612] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [973 Programme, 2015CB150500, 2015CB150500] Funding Source: Medline
  4. the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20160726] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When resources are limited, the hypocrealean fungus Trichoderma guizhouense can overgrow another hypocrealean fungus Fusarium oxysporum, cause sporadic cell death and arrest growth. A transcriptomic analysis of this interaction shows that T. guizhouense undergoes a succession of metabolic stresses while F. oxysporum responded relatively neutrally but used the constitutive expression of several toxin-encoding genes as a protective strategy. Because of these toxins, T. guizhouense cannot approach it is potential host on the substrate surface and attacks F. oxysporum from above. The success of T. guizhouense is secured by the excessive production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which is stored in microscopic bag-like guttation droplets hanging on the contacting hyphae. The deletion of NADPH oxidase nox1 and its regulator, nor1 in T. guizhouense led to a substantial decrease in H2O2 formation with concomitant loss of antagonistic activity. We envision the role of NOX proteins in the antagonism of T. guizhouense as an example of metabolic exaptation evolved in this fungus because the primary function of these ancient proteins was probably not linked to interfungal relationships. In support of this, F. oxysporum showed almost no transcriptional response to T. guizhouense Delta nox1 strain indicating the role of NOX/H2O2 in signalling and fungal communication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据