4.6 Article

Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine for US Children Live Attenuated and Inactivated Influenza Vaccine

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 309-317

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.027

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of NIH [R01GM111121]
  2. Sanofi Pasteur
  3. Pfizer Inc.
  4. Merck Co., Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Prior studies showed that live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is more effectivethan inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in children aged 2-8 years, supporting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations in 2014 for preferential LAIV use in this age group. However, 2014-2015 U.S. effectiveness data indicated relatively poor effectiveness of both vaccines, leading CDC in 2015 to no longer prefer LAIV. Methods: An age-structured model of influenza transmission and vaccination was developed, which incorporated both direct and indirect protection induced by vaccination. Based on this model, the cost effectiveness of influenza vaccination strategies in children aged 2-8 years in the U.S. was estimated. The base case assumed a mixed vaccination strategy where 33.3% and 66.7% of vaccinated children aged 2-8 years receive LAIV and IIV, respectively. Analyses were performed in 2014-2015. Results: Using published meta-analysis vaccine effectiveness data (83% LAIV and 64% IIV), exclusive LAIV use would be a cost-effective strategy when vaccinating children aged 2-8 years, whereas IIV would not be preferred. However, when 2014-2015 U.S. effectiveness data (0% LAIV and 15% IIV) were used, IIV was likely to be preferred. Conclusions: The cost effectiveness of influenza vaccination in children aged 2-8 years is highly dependent on vaccine effectiveness; the vaccine type with higher effectiveness is preferred. In general, exclusive IIV use is preferred over LAIV use, as long as vaccine effectiveness is higher for IIV than for LAIV. (C) 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据