4.7 Article

Removal of masking effect for damage detection of structures

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 646-661

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.005

关键词

Damage detection; Outlier analysis; Novelty detection analysis; Masking effect; Environmental and operational conditions; Regression analysis; Principal Component Analysis; Median Absolute Deviation; Gaussian Mixture Model

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51708306, 51605233]
  2. Ningbo Natural Science Program [2018A610352]
  3. Faculty Inspiration Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damage detection of civil engineering structures relies heavily on the use of outlier analysis/novelty detection analysis. Generally, data captured from a structure in its normal environmental condition are used to create a model and compute control limits to represent the normal range of variations of damage sensitive features of the structure. However, the training database used usually includes outlier measurements, which may introduce masking effect. These outlier measurements can affect the mean and standard deviation/covariance matrix of the training database, and hence, affect the model and the control limits. As a result, small damage may not be detected. Therefore, this paper proposes an approach of selecting a 'clean' training database for the construction of the baseline of the undamaged structure so as to detect damage at an earlier stage. The approach makes use of Principal Component Analysis and Median Absolute Deviation to identify outlier measurements. This approach can be applied before the application of damage detection methods to allow damage to be detected at an earlier stage. The proposed approach is applied to a numerical beam model and the Z24 Bridge, in Switzerland. The results obtained demonstrate that damage can be detected at an earlier stage using the approach proposed in this paper. The proposed method also allows the determination of the model (e.g. linear or nonlinear) to be used for damage detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据