4.7 Article

A lifetime prediction model for coated metallic bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 65-72

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.092

关键词

Lifetime; Prediction model; Metallic bipolar plates; Carbon coating; Proton exchange membrane fuel cells

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2017YFB0102900]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1737214]
  4. Shanghai Automotive Industry Science and Technology Development Foundation [1714]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metallic bipolar plates are considered to be cost-effective and feasible alternative to graphite bipolar plates for high power density of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. However, the lifetime of metallic bipolar plates is determined by surface coating and the durability evaluation is extremely costly and time-consuming. It is urgent to establish a method for the lifetime evaluation and quick development of coated metallic bipolar plates. In this study, a lifetime prediction model for coated metallic bipolar plates is proposed and verified. Firstly, the model is established based on the electrochemical reaction kinetics of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Secondly, the operating conditions for automotive application are equivalent to the ex-situ accelerated tests for the coated metallic bipolar plates and the model is formulated based on the ex-situ accelerated tests. Finally, 2500 h in-situ test of stacks assembled with carbon-coated metallic bipolar plates is carried out to verify the accuracy of the model and the relative prediction error is 8.68%. The universality of the model has been evaluated by applying it to gold-coated metallic bipolar plates, which were tested in-situ in stacks up to 3000 h. This study is beneficial to the quick evaluation of lifetime for coated metallic bipolar plates and provides a theoretical guidance for the rapid development of coatings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据