4.7 Article

Prediction of the solid effective thermal conductivity of fatty acid/carbon material composite phase change materials based on fractal theory

期刊

ENERGY
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 752-762

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.162

关键词

Effective thermal conductivity; Fractal theory; Sierpinski carpet model; Thermal resistance network; Fatty acid/carbon material composite PCMs

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51678488]
  2. Sichuan Province Science and Technology Plan Project [2017JY0252]
  3. Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team of Building Environment and Energy Efficiency [2015TD0015]
  4. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX201600148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermal conductivity of a phase change material (PCM) is an important parameter that affects the heat transfer characteristics of PCM. In this study, the fractal theory is conducted to study the prediction model of the effective thermal conductivity of fatty acid/carbon material composite PCMs in the solid phase. Based on the Sierpinski carpet model of fractal geometry, a series of fractal units with different fractal dimensions are developed for the fatty acid/carbon material composite PCM5. Combined with a self-similar principle and thermal resistance network theory, a general solution for the dimensionless effective thermal conductivity of a typical Sierpinski carpet fractal unit is then derived. Further, dimensionless effective thermal conductivity prediction models of three typical structures of fatty acid/carbon material composite PCMs are obtained by comparing the experimental data. Finally, the thermal conductivity prediction model from this study demonstrated a better reliability than that of the commonly used QP prediction model and Maxwell-Eucken prediction model. This prediction model could be used to predict the effective thermal conductivity of composite PCM5. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据