4.3 Article

Multiscale entropy analysis of heart rate variability in heart failure, hypertensive, and sinoaortic-denervated rats: classical and refined approaches

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00076.2016

关键词

heart failure; baroreflex; hypertension; heart rate variability; complexity; refined multiscale entropy; cardiovascular control; autonomic nervous system

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [2013/20549-7, 2011/12460-0]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior Grant [PNPD20131672]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/12460-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) by nonlinear methods has been gaining increasing interest due to their ability to quantify the complexity of cardiovascular regulation. In this study, multiscale entropy (MSE) and refined MSE (RMSE) were applied to track the complexity of HRV as a function of time scale in three pathological conscious animal models: rats with heart failure (HF), spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), and rats with sinoaortic denervation (SAD). Results showed that HF did not change HRV complexity, although there was a tendency to decrease the entropy in HF animals. On the other hand, SHR group was characterized by reduced complexity at long time scales, whereas SAD animals exhibited a smaller short- and long-term irregularity. We propose that short time scales (1 to 4), accounting for fast oscillations, are more related to vagal and respiratory control, whereas long time scales (5 to 20), accounting for slow oscillations, are more related to sympathetic control. The increased sympathetic modulation is probably the main reason for the lower entropy observed at high scales for both SHR and SAD groups, acting as a negative factor for the cardiovascular complexity. This study highlights the contribution of the multiscale complexity analysis of HRV for understanding the physiological mechanisms involved in cardiovascular regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据