4.5 Article

Application of Hydrodynamic Cavitation for Improving Methane Fermentation of Sida hermaphrodita Silage

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12030526

关键词

Virginia mallow; Virginia fanpetals; hydrodynamic cavitation; biogas production

资金

  1. National Center for Research and Development [1/270745/2/NCBR/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrodynamic cavitation was recently applied as a biomass pretreatment method. Most of the studies which used hydrodynamic cavitation were applied to pretreated sugarcane bagasse or reed. High biomass yield of Sida hermaphrodita points out the necessity of studies on its effective pretreatment before methane fermentation, especially because its wood-like characteristics could present different disintegration properties than other lignocellulose biomass. Thus, the aim of the study was to investigate the influence of duration of hydrodynamic cavitation on lignocellulose composition in Sida hermaphrodita silage, and the assessment of disintegrated biomass as a substrate for methane fermentation. The study showed a slight decrease in lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose content in biomass after hydrodynamic cavitation, which resulted in a higher content of carbohydrates in the liquid fraction of disintegrated substrates. Methane production was 439.1 +/- 45.0 L CH4/kg total solids (TS) from the substrate disintegrated for 20 min. However, the most effective time for methane production was hydrodynamic cavitation of the substrate for 5 min. At this pretreatment duration, the highest values for chemical oxygen demand (COD), total organic carbon (TOC), and carbohydrate reduction were also noted. The study proved that hydrodynamic cavitation applied for 5 min allowed obtaining an energy profit of 0.17 Wh/g TS. The studies on a laboratory scale indicated that the technology of hydrodynamic cavitation of Sida hermaphrodita could be economically applied for methane fermentation on a large scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据