4.6 Article

In-situ growth of nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon nanostructure supported nickel metal nanoparticles for oxygen evolution reaction in an alkaline electrolyte

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 306, 期 -, 页码 617-626

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.181

关键词

Oxygen evolution reaction; Electrocatalyst; Nickel metal; Carbon composite; Nitrogen doping

资金

  1. DGIST - Ministry of Science and ICT of the Korean government [18-NT-02]
  2. Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [18-NT-02] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rational three-dimensional nitrogen doped mesoporous carbon nanostructured surfaced Nickel metal (Ni) nanoparticles (nps), NCNP composites have been developed using nickel organic complex and utilized as an electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction. The NCNP composites of tunable physio-chemical characteristics, such as Ni nps size (similar to 18-similar to 42 nm), surface area (similar to 18-similar to 43m2 g(-1)), pore size (3.23-3.84 nm) and nitrogen doping amount (1.20-3.87 wt%) have been achieved via controlled carbonization temperature. An optimized NCNP composite of favorable physio-chemical properties has delivered good oxygen evolution kinetics such as a lower overpotential value (370 mV) at 10mA cm(-2), a minimum Tafel slope value (55 mV dec(-1)), and relatively a higher electrochemical surface area (0.6325 cm(-2)) than the other NCNP composites. Moreover, the best NCNP electrocatalyst has shown a comparable overpotential value with the benchmarking catalyst at 10mA cm(-2), equivalent to similar to 0% solar photoelectrical conversion efficiency. In addition, the best NCNP electrocatalyst has exhibited excellent accelerated degradation test for 24 h at a constant current density of 10 mAcm(-2) with an increase overpotential value of 0.029 V. (c) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据