4.6 Article

Hierarchical void structured Si/PANi/C hybrid anode material for high-performance lithium-ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 300, 期 -, 页码 341-348

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.01.126

关键词

Si/PANi/C; Hierarchical void structure; Cycling stability; Anode; Lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0102000]
  2. NSAF [U1530155]
  3. 13th Five-Year Plan of Advance Research, Sharing Techniques by Equipment Department [41421040202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicon (Si) is regarded as the most attractive anode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries due to its high theoretical specific capacity. Unfortunately, Si experiences significant volume changes, leading to severe capacity fading and poor cycling stability. Here, novel hierarchical void structured Si/PANi/C microspheres are designed and synthesized to tackle these problems. In this architecture, silicon nanoparticles (SiNPs) with conductive polymer conformal coating are homogeneously dispersed in a three-dimensional porous polymer framework which is partially carbonized. The void space in highly porous matrix is not only capable of accommodating volume expansion but also favorable for liquid electrolyte penetration, enabling extremely stable cycling performance and superior rate capability, along with high areal mass loading. The outside carbon layer containing nitrogen may help attain a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) film. The resultant Si/PANi/C anode reaches the reversible charge capacity of 1470 mAh g(-1) at 100 mA g(-1) and the average capacity loss after 200 cycles is only 0.04% per cycle. Moreover, Si/PANi/C anode exhibits excellent rate performance of similar to 790 mAh g(-1) even at 1 A g(-1) and its Coulombic efficiency increases to 99% after only 3 cycles. Remarkably, the reversible areal capacity is high with a value of 2.74 mAh cm(-2) at a high mass loading of similar to 1.9 mg cm(-2). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据