4.6 Article

A physics-based distributed-parameter equivalent circuit model for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 299, 期 -, 页码 451-469

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.167

关键词

Lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery; Electrochemical model; Finite volume method; Equivalent circuit model; Battery energy storage system

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP160101325]
  2. Queensland University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A physics-based equivalent circuit model (ECM) is derived by applying finite volume method to a pseudo-two-dimensional (P2D) model of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries. Only standard passive components are used to construct the equivalent circuit, which reflects the fact that a Li-ion battery is an energy storage device. Voltages across and currents through the circuit elements in the ECM are identified with the respective internal electrochemical processes in the battery, thus allowing the parametric values of circuit elements to be expressed as functions of the Li-ion concentrations and temperature. Variations in the parametric values across the thickness of the battery leads to a distributed-parameter ECM amenable for wide range of applications. Furthermore, in contrast to existing reduced-order models of Li-ion battery which are described by differential algebraic equations, the ECM is governed by ordinary different equations wherein all the circuit components are expressed as explicit functions of the state and input variables. Hence, the developed model allows solution to be found directly using matrix algebra, resulting in rapid simulation study suitable for the development of computationally-efficient real-time battery control algorithm. Results of simulation based on the developed distributed-parameter ECM show close agreement with those obtained from a partial differential equation based P2D model under wide range of applied current rate, but at a much reduced computational burden. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据