4.6 Article

1,1-Dimethylpyrrolidinium tetrafluoroborate as novel salt for high-voltage electric double-layer capacitors

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 299, 期 -, 页码 98-106

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.155

关键词

1,1-Dimethylpyrrolidinium; tetrafluoroborate; Supercapacitor; Electrolyte salt; Specific capacitance; Cycling stability

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2017R1C1B2004307]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2017M2A8A5014710]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel quaternary ammonium salt-1,1-dimethylpyrrolidinium tetrafluoroborate (DMPBF4), tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TEABF(4)), and spiro-(1,1')-bipyrrolidinium tetrafluoroborate (SBPBF4) were prepared and dissolved in acetonitrile (ACN) and propylene carbonate (PC) for electrolyte systems of electric double-layer capacitors (EDLC). Physical properties such as thermal stability, solubility, and ionic conductivity were determined and six different electrolyte systems with 1 M concentration were electrochemically evaluated by linear sweep voltammetry, cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge-discharge, and float test. To investigate the origin of the physical and electrochemical properties at the molecular level, quantum calculations for the chemical species in the electrolytes were also carried out. Compared to the standard electrolytes TEABF(4) and SBPBF4, the novel DMPBF4 electrolyte exhibits a higher gravimetric capacitance, superior rate capability, and improved cycling stability. The energy and power density of EDLCs using DMPBF4 in the ACN electrolyte reach 40.61Wh kg(-1) and 8.09 kW kg(-1), respectively, at the working voltage of 3.0 V. Moreover, EDLCs with DMPBF4 in ACN (PC) retain 87.9% (87.5%) of their initial capacitance after 1000 h of float testing at 3.0 V. The results indicate that DMPBF4 can be a promising electrolyte salt for EDLC application. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据