4.6 Article

Determination of staphylococcus aureus mycoprotein by using ELISA based on oscillating chemical kinetic detection

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 298, 期 -, 页码 670-677

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.093

关键词

Oscillating chemical; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Belousov-zhabotinskii; Staphylococcus aureus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21563011]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China [20181BAB204012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oscillating chemical detection has the advantages of high sensitivity and fast and simple operation, but it is also very vulnerable to many additional species and has low selectivity, poor qualitative analysis and poor detection of macromolecules. This article establishes a Belousov-Zhabotinskii oscillating chemical detection system with good stability and repeatability, which involves ([CuL](ClO4)(2)) as a catalyst and C3H6O and C6H12O6 as a mixed substrate, as well as an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detection system, with disodium phenyl phosphate dihydrate (DPPD) as the key substrate and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as a catalyst. This article introduces the oscillating chemical detection system into the enzyme-linked immune detection system and establishes the detection method, which combines the advantages of chemical oscillation with those of ELISA, including good selectivity and high specificity, to test the Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) protein. There is a good linear proportionality between the concentration of the S. aureus protein and the oscillating amplitude change Delta A, and the detection sensitivity of the method is much higher than that of normal spectrophotometry. The sensitivity of biotin-streptomycin ELISA with a detection limit (3 sigma) of 1.56 x 10(-11) g/mL is better than that of double-antibody sandwich ELISA with a detection limit (3 sigma) of 1.06 x 10(-9) g/mL. Therefore, this method can be applied to the detection of the S. aureus protein antigen. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据