4.6 Article

Strategies for the electrobioremediation of oxyfluorfen polluted soils

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 137-144

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.195

关键词

Biobarrier; Bioremediation; Electrokinetics; Oxyfluorfen; Polluted soil

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness
  2. European Union [CTM2016-76197-R]
  3. FPI doctoral grant [BES-2014-069662]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work compares three strategies for the in-situ remediation of oxyfluorfen polluted clay soil, based on the combination of biological processes and electrokinetics (EK): (i) EK-biostimulation, in which the action of microorganisms contained in soil is promoted without the use of biological permeable barriers, (ii) EK-bioaugmentation with fixed culture of microorganisms (BB1), which enhanced the natural bioremediation by including a microbial fixed biofilm reactor as permeable biobarrier, and (iii) EK-bioaugmentation with suspended culture of microorganisms (BB2), which improves the natural remediation by including a mixture of soil and a microbial suspension as permeable biobarrier. To do this, two-week batch electro-bioremediation tests were carried out using bench scale set-ups. In each case, a constant electric field (1 V cm(-1)) was applied, and electrode polarity was reversed periodically, every 12 h. In addition, a microbial consortium acclimated to oxyfluorfen biodegradation was used. The best oxyfluorfen removal efficiency (15%) was obtained using the option (i). Permeable biobarriers allowed the introduction of microorganism and nutrients into the soil, and the biological activity reached the whole soil positions. However, the insertion of these biobarriers caused an excessive decrease in the electro-osmotic flow (approximately 80%) which, in turn reduced the mobilization of the pollutants. Despite of that, results show that permeable reactive biobarriers may result in a successful alternative for in-situ EK-bioaugmentation, although higher retention times would be needed to obtain higher removal efficiencies. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据