4.6 Article

Novel rod-shaped organic sensitizers for liquid and quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 295, 期 -, 页码 934-941

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.132

关键词

Metal-free sensitizer; Rod-shaped; Quasi-solid-state; Power conversion efficiency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21462054, 61368006]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Department, China [LH [2015]7036, [2015]4003, [2016]1419]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Education Department, China [[2014]42]
  4. Science and Technology Cooperation talent Project of ZunYi City, China [[2016]14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two novel D-pi-A dyes (FD and SD) have been synthesized for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The two rod-shaped molecules with an identical pi-spacer di(1-benzothieno)[3,2-b: 2',3'-d] pyrrole and with a different donor group 5,11-dihydroindolo[3,2-b] carbazole for FD or 11,12-dihydroindolo[2,3-a] carbazole for SD have been investigated. Compared to FD, the sensitizer SD not only showed a broader absorption spectrum extended to infrared region which was conducive to enhancing the light-trapping capability and thus to increase the photocurrent of the device fabricated with SD, but also exhibited better inhibition of dye aggregation resulting in a higher photovoltage. With the co-adsorption of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs based on the two dyes has dropped significantly. The results indicate that the aggregation of the two dyes FD and SD can be controlled by linking multiple branched alkyl chains in the structure. Finally, FD and SD-based cells without CDCA achieved power conversion efficiencies (PCE) of 7.20% and 7.47%, respectively, in liquid DSSCs. Correspondingly, FD and SD displayed PCE values of 5.77% and 6.67% in quasi-solid-state DSSCs, respectively, under standard global 1.5 solar conditions. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据