4.6 Article

Addition of reduced graphene oxide to an activated-carbon cathode increases electrical power generation of a microbial fuel cell by enhancing cathodic performance

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 613-622

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.024

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Cathode; Catalyst layer; Activated carbon; Reduced graphene oxide; Impedance

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2018R1D1A1B07050567]
  2. Gwangju Green Environment Center in Ministry of Environment [17-04-10-14-12]
  3. Korea Electric Power Corporation through Korea Electrical Engineering and Science Research Institute [R15XA03-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated carbon (AC) is an inexpensive catalyst for oxygen reduction in an air cathode of microbial fuel cells (MFCs). In the AC-based cathode, carbon black (CB) is used as a conductive supporting material. In this study, it was hypothesized cathodic performance would increase if reduced graphene oxide (rGO) replaces CB in an optimum ratio. rGO replaced CB in the four different weight ratios of rGO toCB: 0:30 (rGO0); 5:25 (rGO5); 15:15 (rGO15); 30:0 (rGO30). Maximum power density was the best in rGO15 (2642 mW/m(2)) followed by rGO5 (2142 mW/m(2)). In the optimum external resistance operation, rGO5 and rGO15 showed similar power (similar to 1060 mW/m(2)), higher than the others. Linear sweep voltammetry, cyclic voltammetry, and impedance spectroscopy also showed that the optimal rGO additions improved cathodic performance and reduced cathodic internal resistance. Due to the flatter and wider shape of rGO and 5 times higher electrical conductivity than CB, the rGO addition improved the cathodic performance, but the complete replacement of CB with rGO decreased the cathodic performance due to the increased thickness and the morphological crack. The optimum rGO addition is a simple and effective method for improving cathodic performance. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据