4.6 Article

Aging is associated with changes to the biomechanical properties of the posterior cerebral artery and parenchymal arterioles

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00562.2015

关键词

aging; cerebrovascular circulation; remodeling; vasculature

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [PO1-HL-070687]
  2. Jackson and American Heart Association [13GRNT17210000]
  3. National Institutes of Health [5T32-GM-092715-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artery remodeling, described as a change in artery structure, may be responsible for the increased risk of cardiovascular disease with aging. Although the risk for stroke is known to increase with age, relatively young animals have been used in most stroke studies. Therefore, more information is needed on how aging alters the biomechanical properties of cerebral arteries. Posterior cerebral arteries (PCAs) and parenchymal arterioles (PAs) are important in controlling brain perfusion. We hypothesized that aged (22-24 mo old) C57bl/6 mice would have stiffer PCAs and PAs than young (3-5 mo old) mice. The biomechanical properties of the PCAs and PAs were assessed by pressure myography. Data are presented as means +/- SE of young vs. old. In the PCA, older mice had increased outer (155.6 +/- 3.2 vs. 169.9 +/- 3.2 mu m) and lumen (116.4 +/- 3.6 vs. 137.1 +/- 4.7 mu m) diameters. Wall stress (375.6 +/- 35.4 vs. 504.7 +/- 60.0 dyn/cm(2)) and artery stiffness (beta-coefficient: 5.2 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.6 +/- 0.9) were also increased. However, wall strain (0.8 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.1) was reduced with age. In the PAs from old mice, wall thickness (3.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.1 +/- 0.2 mu m) and area (591.1 +/- 95.4 vs. 852.8 +/- 100 +/- mu m(2)) were increased while stress (758.1 +/- 100.0 vs. 587.2 +/- 35.1 dyn/cm2) was reduced. Aging also increased mean arterial and pulse pressures. We conclude that age-associated remodeling occurs in large cerebral arteries and arterioles and may increase the risk of cerebrovascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据