4.8 Article

Effects of pesticides on exposure and susceptibility to parasites can be generalised to pesticide class and type in aquatic communities

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 962-972

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13253

关键词

Aquatic ecology; community ecology; disease transmission; ecotoxicology; pesticides

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM109499, R01TW010286-01]
  2. National Science Foundation [EEID-1518681, EF-1241889, IOS-1754868]
  3. US Department of Agriculture [NRI 2009-35102-0543]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pesticide pollution can alter parasite transmission, but scientists are unaware if effects of pesticides on parasite exposure and host susceptibility (i.e. infection risk given exposure) can be generalised within a community context. Using replicated temperate pond communities, we evaluate effects of 12 pesticides, nested in four pesticide classes (chloroacetanilides, triazines, carbamates organophosphates) and two pesticide types (herbicides, insecticides) applied at standardised environmental concentrations on larval amphibian exposure and susceptibility to trematode parasites. Most of the variation in exposure and susceptibility occurred at the level of pesticide class and type, not individual compounds. The organophosphate class of insecticides increased snail abundance (first intermediate host) and thus trematode exposure by increasing mortality of snail predators (top-down mechanism). While a similar pattern in snail abundance and trematode exposure was observed with triazine herbicides, this effect was driven by increases in snail resources (periphytic algae, bottom-up mechanism). Additionally, herbicides indirectly increased host susceptibility and trematode infections by (1) increasing time spent in susceptible early developmental stages and (2) suppressing tadpole immunity. Understanding generalisable effects associated with contaminant class and type on transmission is critical in reducing complexities in predicting disease dynamics in at-risk host populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据