4.3 Article

Acid rain decelerates the decomposition of Cunninghamia lanceolata needle and Cinnamomum camphora leaf litters in a karst region in China

期刊

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 193-200

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1440-1703.1065

关键词

acid rain; CO2 flux; enzyme activities; fungal biomass; mass loss

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acid rain is generally believed to inhibit litter decomposition, but this inhibition effect often depends on local soil environmental factors such as nutrient and physicochemical property. Karst ecosystem is typically characterized by rich CaCO3, which can potentially react with H+ from acid rain. However, it is unknown whether the effect of acid rain on litter decomposition will be mitigated by this potential reaction. To investigate the effect of acid rain on decomposition, we undertook a field experiment on the decomposition of litters of Cunninghamia lanceolata needle and Cinnamomum camphora leaf during 1 year in a karst region in subtropical China. Contrary to hypothesis, litter decomposition was significantly decelerated by acid rain for the two litter types. For C. lanceolata litter, at the end of incubation, we noted that moderate acid rain resulted in the highest loss in mass (43%), while severe one showed the lowest loss (39%); for C. camphora litter, the mass loss was as follows: ambient treatment (66%)>moderate treatment (56%)>severe treatment (42%). Also microbial activities (including CO2 flux, fungal biomass and microbial degrading enzymes) showed similar variation patterns among acid rain treatments to mass loss. These responses indicated that the deceleration effect of acid rain on litter decomposition did not depend on calcareous soil as well as litter quality. Together, these results suggest that acid rain had a predominant controlling of litter decomposition over soil and litter qualities, and this information may be useful for predicting functional responses of karst ecosystem to environmental factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据