4.6 Article

Induced polarization as a monitoring tool for in-situ microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) processes

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 36-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.11.010

关键词

Microbial induced carbonate precipitation; Soil stabilization; Geophysical methods; Induced polarization; Ground improvement

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1363224]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1363224] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) is a promising soil stabilization method performed by stimulating soil microbes that are naturally occurring and ubiquitous in soil systems. The precipitated carbonate acts as a cementation agent to bind loose soil at grain to grain contacts. MICP has been extensively tested and proven in laboratory environments, as well as in limited field trials; however, long term field applications still remain challenging, partly due to quality control and monitoring issues. Induced polarization (IP), an established geophysical method in mineral exploration, is a prime candidate for MICP monitoring and characterization. This study presents the geophysical results of a 15-day field-scale MICP project. The MICP treatment involved the injection of molasses (carbon source for microbial proliferation) and urea in a Ca2+ rich aquifer. IP monitoring successfully delineated, spatially and temporally, the propagation of MICP in the treatment area, while common resistivity measurements failed to capture any MICP related changes. Reduced hydraulic conductivity in the treatment area versus untreated area, further supports that MICP has changed the physical properties of the subsurface. Furthermore, conventional geochemical monitoring as well as X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed carbonate precipitation in samples from discrete wells in the treatment area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据