4.6 Article

Renal denervation improves cardiac function in rats with chronic heart failure: Effects on expression of β-adrenoceptors

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00999.2015

关键词

renal nerve; sympathetic nerve activity; cardiac function; heart failure

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R56 HL124104, P01 HL62222]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic activation of the sympathetic drive contributes to cardiac remodeling and dysfunction during chronic heart failure (HF). The present study was undertaken to assess whether renal denervation (RDN) would abrogate the sympathoexcitation in HF and ameliorate the adrenergic dysfunction and cardiac damage. Ligation of the left coronary artery was used to induce HF in Sprague-Dawley rats. Four weeks after surgery, RDN was performed, 1 wk before the final measurements. At the end of the protocol, cardiac function was assessed by measuring ventricular hemodynamics. Rats with HF had an average infarct area >30% of the left ventricle and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) >20 mmHg. beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptor proteins in the left ventricle were reduced by 37 and 49%, respectively, in the rats with HF. RDN lowered elevated levels of urinary excretion of norepinephrine and brain natriuretic peptide levels in the hearts of rats with HF. RDN also decreased LVEDP to 10 mmHg and improved basal dP/dt to within the normal range in rats with HF. RDN blunted loss of beta(1)-adrenoceptor (by 47%) and beta(2)-adrenoceptor (by 100%) protein expression and improved isoproterenol (0.5 mu g/kg)-induced increase in +dP/dt (by 71%) and -dP/dt (by 62%) in rats with HF. RDN also attenuated the increase in collagen 1 expression in the left ventricles of rats with HF. These findings demonstrate that RDN initiated in chronic HF condition improves cardiac function mediated by adrenergic agonist and blunts beta-adrenoceptor expression loss, providing mechanistic insights for RDN-induced improvements in cardiac function in the HF condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据