4.2 Article

Lichens exerts an anti-proliferative effect on human breast and lung cancer cells through induction of apoptosis

期刊

DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 259-267

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01480545.2019.1573825

关键词

Apoptosis; cancer cell death; cytotoxicity; lichens; Usnea intermedia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the anti-growth/apoptotic effects of methanol extracts of lichen species on human lung and breast cancer cell lines, with Usnea intermedia showing strong anti-growth activity in a dose-dependent manner. It was particularly cytotoxic against MDA-MB-231 and H1299 cells, with potential as a new alternative in cancer treatment.
Successful cancer treatment still requires new complexes or compounds from natural sources. Therefore, we investigated anti-growth/apoptotic effects of methanol extracts of the lichen species (Xanthoparmelia somloensis (Gleyn.) Hale, Usnea intermedia (A. Massal.) Jatta, Bryoria capillaris (Ach.) Brodo & D. Hawksw and Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm.) on human lung (A549, H1299) and breast (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231) cancer cell lines. Anti-growth effects were monitored by the MTT and ATP viability assays. Cell death mode was evaluated by employing the fluorescence staining of nucleus, caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 detection, caspase 3/7 activity assay, Anneksin V cytofluorimetric assay and mitochondria membrane potential assay. Among the lichen extracts, Usnea intermedia exhibited strong anti-growth activity in a dose-dependent manner (1.56-100 mu g/ml) compared to the others. Usnea intermedia was especially cytotoxic against MDA-MB-231 and H1299 cells (IC50 value for was found 3.0 and 10.2 mu g/ml respectively). The cytotoxicity was resulted from apoptosis as proved by the presence of pyknotic nuclei, caspase 3/7 activity, phosphatidylserine translocation and loss of mitochondria membrane potential. In conclusion, Usnea intermedia warrants for further in vivo evaluation as a new alternative in cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据