4.2 Article

Prognostic Values of Systemic Inflammation Response (SIR) Parameters in Resectable Cervical Cancer

期刊

DOSE-RESPONSE
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1559325819829543

关键词

cervical cancer; systemic inflammation response; prognosis; overall survival

资金

  1. Science and Education for Health Foundation of Suzhou for Youth [kjxw2018030, kjxw2018032]
  2. Science and Technology Project Foundation of Suzhou [SS201651]
  3. Education Research Project Foundation of Nanjing Medical University [FZS-ZD-201701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cervical carcinoma is the leading cause of cancer mortality in women. C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLB), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) are indicators of systemic inflammation response correlated with tumor outcomes. Methods: This study recruited 110 patients with cervical cancer. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to pretreatment median values of CRP, ALB, GLB, LDH, and AGR. The post/preradiotherapy or post/pretreatment ratios were defined as rates of pretreatment CRP, ALB, GLB, LDH, and AGR values and the corresponding ones obtained after radiotherapy or whole treatment. Results: Higher pretreatment CRP or LDH levels were correlated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Increased post/preradiotherapy CRP ratio was correlated with worse PFS and OS, increased post/preradiotherapy LDH ratio was correlated with worse PFS. Increased post/pretreatment CRP ratio was correlated with worse PFS and OS, not-increased post/pretreatment AGR ratio was correlated with worse OS. Cox regression analysis model indicated that, moderately or poorly of differentiation, higher pretreatment CRP or LDH levels were independently associated with worse PFS, higher pretreatment CRP or LDH levels and increased post/pretreatment CRP ratio were independently associated with worse OS. Conclusion: CRP, LDH, or AGR are correlated with outcomes of resectable cervical cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据