4.4 Article

Risk Factors for the Development of Stent-Associated Cholangitis Following Endoscopic Biliary Stent Placement

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 64, 期 8, 页码 2300-2307

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05533-6

关键词

ERCP complication; Cholangitis; Biliary stenting complication; Malignant biliary obstruction

资金

  1. University of Vermont Medical Center Gastroenterology Fellow's Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and AimTo elucidate the overall risk and risk factors for developing cholangitis following biliary stent placement by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and to determine the clinical outcomes of these individuals.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 796 patients who had undergone 1127 ERCPs with biliary stent placement between 2007 and 2015 at a single tertiary care center. There were 91 episodes of stent-associated cholangitis (SAC) during the study period. Data obtained through the medical records included ERCP indication, patient factors (biliary anatomy, demographics, and comorbidities), stent characteristics (material, length, and design), change in serum bilirubin, stent indwelling time, rates and etiologies of bacteremia, and the mortality rate.ResultsThose with SAC were more likely to have an anatomic biliary stricture (13.1% vs. 2.3%, p<.0001), with hilar and multiple strictures having the highest risk (19.1% vs. 11.6%, p=.04). The ERCP indication of malignant biliary obstruction was associated with higher rates of SAC (15.6% vs. 3.4%, p=<.0001). Rates of SAC were higher in those who failed to normalize total bilirubin (16.9% vs. 7.8%, p=.0005), and these episodes occurred earlier compared to those who normalized total bilirubin (median 30.5days vs. 140.5days, p<.0001).ConclusionsPatients at increased risk of SAC include those with an anatomic stricture, malignant biliary obstruction, and those who fail to normalize total bilirubin after biliary stent placement. Future protocols should be designed to reduce the risk of cholangitis in these populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据