4.5 Article

Plasma omentin levels are associated with vascular endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes at elevated cardiovascular risk

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 160-168

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.01.009

关键词

Omentin; Adipokine; Endothelial function; Flow-mediated dilatation; Type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20591068]
  2. Novartis Pharma Research Grants 2017

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Omentin is an adipokine that has protective effects against cardiovascular damage. Previous studies showed an inverse relationship between omentin and obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to investigate the association between omentin and vascular endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: The subjects were 425 patients with T2D and 223 non-diabetic controls. Fasting plasma omentin levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) wasmeasured by ultrasonography. Results: Plasma omentin levels were higher, while FMD was lower in participants with T2D than in non-diabetic controls. No significant correlation was found between plasma omentin levels and FMD in either non-diabetic controls or participants with T2D on multivariate analysis. However, stratified analysis in T2D patients revealed that plasma omentin levels were independently and positively associated with FMD in high cardiovascular risk subgroups according to age (>= 65 years), estimated glomerular filtration rate (<60 mL/min/1.73m2), or preexisting cardiovascular diseases but not in low-risk subgroups. Conclusions: Plasma omentin levels are independently associated with endothelial function in subgroups of patients with T2D at elevated cardiovascular risk. This study suggests a protective role of omentin against endothelial dysfunction, particularly in high-risk patients. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据