4.4 Article

Embryonic and postembryonic development of the ornamental twin-tail goldfish

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS
卷 248, 期 4, 页码 251-283

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.15

关键词

Artificial selection; domestication; chordin; dorsal-ventral patterning

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [106-2311-B-001-031-MY3]
  2. Academia Sinica, Taiwan [CDA-103-L05]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan [JP16K18546]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Twin-tail ornamental goldfish have bifurcated median fins, a peculiar morphology known to be caused by a mutation in the chdA gene. However, several ambiguities regarding the development of the phenotype remain due to a paucity of detailed observations covering the entire developmental timeframe. Results Here, we report a detailed comparative description of embryonic and postembryonic development for two representative twin-tail ornamental goldfish strains and single-tail common goldfish. Our observations reveal a polymorphic developmental process for bifurcated median fins; disrupted axial skeletal development at early larval stages; and modified bilateral location of the pelvic fin. Conclusions Variations in development of bifurcated median fins and disrupted axial skeletal patterns reflect how artificial selection for adult morphological features influenced molecular developmental mechanisms during the domestication of twin-tail ornamental goldfish. The polymorphic appearance of bifurcated median fins also implies that, unlike previously proposed hypotheses, the development of these structures is controlled by molecular mechanisms independent of those acting on the pelvic fin. Our present findings will facilitate further study of how modifications of preexisting developmental systems may contribute to novel morphological features. Developmental Dynamics 248:251-283, 2019. (c) 2019 The Authors. Developmental Dynamics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Anatomists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据