4.2 Review

Targeting advanced urothelial carcinoma-developing strategies

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 207-215

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000532

关键词

antibody-drug conjugates; immune checkpoint inhibitors; targeted therapy; urothelial carcinoma

类别

资金

  1. MD Anderson Physician Scientist Award
  2. Khalifa Physician Scientist Award
  3. Andrew Sabin Family Foundation Fellows Award
  4. MD Anderson Faculty Scholar Award
  5. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Career Development Award
  6. Wendy and Leslie Irvin Barnhart Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Advanced urothelial carcinoma is a heterogeneous disease with high burden of morbidity, mortality, and cost. Significant progress has been made in understanding the biology of the disease and the development of immunotherapies and targeted therapies. In this review, we summarize the current and future therapeutic approaches in the management of urothelial carcinoma. Recent findings Advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors resulted in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of atezolizumab in 2016, and pembrolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, and nivolumab in 2017 for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. More recently, development of inhibitors targeting the fibroblast growth factor receptor genetic alterations and antibody-drug conjugates targeting specific cell surface antigens (trop2, nectin4, and SLITRK6) resulted in several FDA breakthrough designations for urothelial carcinoma. Conclusion The development of novel therapies targeting the immune and molecular pathways of advanced urothelial carcinoma is promising for the improvement of outcomes in this lethal disease. Ongoing efforts are poised to optimize therapeutic options in the post-chemotherapy arena. In the era of precision medicine, the future of urothelial carcinoma lies in using less cytotoxic chemotherapy, more targeted therapy and immunotherapy, and possibly a combination of these therapeutic approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据