4.2 Review

Immune checkpoint blockade for organ transplant patients with advanced cancer: how far can we go?

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 54-64

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000505

关键词

allograft rejection; checkpoint inhibitors; hepatocellular carcinoma; ipilimumab; kidney transplant; liver transplant; melanoma; nivolumab; organ transplant recipients; pembrolizumab

类别

资金

  1. Department of Medical Oncology, Radiotherapy of the Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
  2. Department of Medical Oncology and Dermatology of the Erasmus Hospital, Brussels

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) provide impressive response rates among immunocompetent patients with various solid tumors. So far, organ transplant recipients have been excluded from clinical studies due to the putative risk of allograft rejection however 48 cases of liver and renal transplant patients treated with CPI were already described in literature. Recent findings Here we discuss 19 cases of liver and 29 cases of renal transplant patients who received CPI for advanced cancer. Disease control rate [ stable disease, complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) together] was 35% (21% for liver and 45% for kidney transplant patients). Graft rejection was seen in 37% of liver and 45% and kidney transplant patients. Significantly, our analysis shows that an ` ideal' response occurs in 21% of all patients (antitumor response accompanied with durable graft tolerance). Summary We believe that transplant patients can be treated with CPI in a controlled setting and for well informed patients. To obtain a durable antitumor immune response while avoiding rejection, to be able to adjust immunosuppression and to have the opportunity to develop biomarkers for tumor response and transplant rejection, these patients should be treated according to a clinical care path or a prospective clinical trial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据