4.4 Article

Correlating the Modes of Corrosion with Microstructure in the Friction Stir Welded AA2198-T8 Alloy in Aqueous Hydrogen Peroxide-Chloride Medium

期刊

CORROSION
卷 75, 期 6, 页码 628-640

出版社

NATL ASSOC CORROSION ENG
DOI: 10.5006/3054

关键词

AA2198-T8 alloy; FSW; localized corrosion; microhardness

资金

  1. Capes/Cofecub [806-14]
  2. CAPES [99999.000332/2016-00, 99999.000400/2016-05]
  3. FAPESP [2017/03095-3, 2013/13235-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, different types of localized corrosion in the friction stir welding (FSW) zones of an AA2198-T8 when the alloy is subjected to a corrosion test in a hydrogen peroxide-chloride solution (according to ASTM G110 standard) has been investigated. The corrosion modes were correlated with microstructure, especially with respect to the T1 phase and coarse Al-Cu-Fe phase distribution across the weldment. Simulated thermal profile and microhardness measurements were used to establish the variations in T1 phase distribution. Two types of corrosion were observed in the FSW zones: intense pitting and intergranular corrosion-type I; and the formation of cavities and trenches-type II. Type I is associated with the T1 phase while type II is associated with Al-Cu-Fe coarse intermetallics. Both types were found on the base metal (BM) and heat affected zone, but the type I reduced in the latter toward the stir zone (SZ). The SZ/thermo-mechanically affected zone (TMAZ) exhibited only type II. Also, Cu enrichment was observed around the type II sites in the SZ/ TMAZ. Furthermore, an inverse correlation between microhardness and corrosion resistance which was related to T1 phase concentration in the different zones was also observed. Moreover, the SZ and BM were isolated and evaluated by an immersion test and electrochemical analysis using the ASTM G110 test solution. The results indicated galvanic coupling effects, as the SZ was strongly attacked when exposed separately compared to when it was coupled with the other zones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据