4.7 Article

A two-step risk assessment method for radiofrequency ablations of spine metastases

期刊

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 174-181

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.007

关键词

radiofrequency ablations; Needle-based interventions; Risk visualization; Bone drilling; Treatment of bone metastases

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the Forschungscampus STIMULATE [13GW0095A, 13GW0095B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Spine metastases (MTS) can be treated via Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) electrodes. To bring these electrodes into vertebral MTS, pathways have to be created. This can be done via transpedicular hammering or drilling. However, this is challenging due to spatial constraints, and because MTS can alter bone density considerably. Method. In this work a two-step method is presented that intends to offer cognitive and physical assistance. Step 1 comprises two visualization methods that depict safety margins between and in risk structures. For Step 2, the correlation between Hounsfield Units (HUs) and drilling forces was analyzed to support manual and robot-assisted RFAs. Results: In-depth descriptions of two clinical cases and detailed feedback from the local clinic of neuroradiology are used to present the capabilities of the proposed method. Furthermore, a stiffness criterion is presented to predict drilling force changes from the local distribution and homogeneity of HUs with an inaccuracy of less than 1 mm. Conclusions: The combination of visualization and drilling force prediction shows potential to support manual and robot-assisted spine RFAs. However, limitations have to be addressed in the future. For example, it has to be carefully evaluated to which extent the proposed method can speed up the planning process and increase intervention safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据