4.5 Article

Predictors of Altered Upper Extremity Function During the First Year After Breast Cancer Treatment

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000455

关键词

Upper Extremity; Mobility; Function; Grip Strength; Range of Motion; Breast Cancer

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [CA107091, CA118658]
  2. NCI [CA168960]
  3. NICHD/NIH [K12HD052163]
  4. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH, through UCSF-CTSI Grant [KL2TR000143]
  5. NIH/NCRR UCSF-CTSI Grant [UL1RR024131]
  6. [BIRCWH K12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trajectories of and predictors for changes in upper extremity (UE) function in women (n = 396) during the first year after breast cancer treatment. Design: Prospective, longitudinal assessments of shoulder range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and perceived interference of function were performed before and for 1 year after surgery. Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were evaluated as predictors of postoperative function. Results: Women had a mean (SD) age of 54.9 (11.6) years, and 64% were white. Small but statistically significant reductions in shoulder ROM were found on the affected side over 12 months (P < 0.001). Predictors of interindividual differences in ROM at the 1-month assessment were ethnicity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, type of surgery, axillary lymph node dissection, and preoperative ROM. Predictors of interindividual differences in changes over time in postoperative ROM were living alone, type of surgery, axillary lymph node dissection, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Declines in mean grip strength from before through 1 month after surgery were small and not clinically meaningful. Women with greater preoperative breast pain interference scores had higher postoperative interference scores at all postoperative assessments. Conclusion: Some of the modifiable risk factors identified in this study can be targeted for intervention to improve UE function in these women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据