4.7 Article

Prediction and elucidation of factors affecting solubilisation of imatinib mesylate in lipids

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 443-450

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.11.033

关键词

Imatinib mesylate; Lipids; Solubility; Physico-chemical properties; QSSR model

资金

  1. Tamil Nadu State Council for Science and Technology, Dept. of Higher Education, Government of Tamilnadu
  2. National Science Center, Poland [2016/21/B/NZ9/01980]
  3. European Union [621321, W26/7.PR/2015 [GA 3413/7.PR/2015/2]]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physico-chemical properties of lipids influencing the solubilisation of imatinib mesylate (IM) in lipid matrix were evaluated and a statistical model to predict the same has been derived in the present study. After experimental quantification of IM solubility in various lipids, Hansen Hildebrand's total solubility parameters were calculated in order to study the role of various forces connected to lipid-drug interaction. To develop a relationship between the various descriptors of the lipids and experimental solubility of IM in lipids (% w/w), quantitative structure-solubility relationship (QSSR) was used. To generate equations that can predict the solubility of IM in lipids (%w/w), multiple linear regression was used. Amongst the various lipids tested, glyceryl monostearate and behenic acid solubilised the highest (6.19 +/- 0.22%) and lowest (0.01 +/- 0.01%) amounts of IM respectively. Our results suggested that alkyl chain length, polarity of the lipids, index of cohesive interaction in solids, estimated number of hydrogen bonds that would be accepted by the solute from water molecules in an aqueous solution, estimated number of hydrogen bonds that would be donated by the solute to water molecules in an aqueous solution and solvent accessible surface area collectively play a significant role in solubilising IM in the lipids. The equation developed could predict the solubility of IM in lipids with good accuracy (R-pred(2) = 0.912).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据