4.7 Article

Facile fabrication of superporous and biocompatible hydrogel scaffolds for artificial corneal periphery

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 26-35

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.11.013

关键词

Biocompatibility; Porous hydrogels; Artificial cornea material; Solvent-induced phase separation; Subcutaneous implantation

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 104-2221-E-002-077-MY3, MOST 107-2221-E-002 -187 -MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biocompatible and highly porous network hydrogel scaffolds were fabricated for the development of artificial cornea (AC) periphery/skirt that could be used to enhance the long-term retention of the implants. In this study, a series of hydrogel scaffolds for this application was fabricated from the photo-polymerization of a mixture of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)- and poloxamer (P407)-based macromer solutions in dichloromethane in which solvent-induced phase separation (SIPS) arose to form scaffolds with macroporous structure and high water content. The overall porosity ranging from 20% to 75% and open/closed pore structure of the hydrogel scaffolds could be finely tuned by varying the ratio of P407/PEG in the macromer solution and solvent type. The total porosity and open-cell structure of the macropores in the synthesized hydrogel scaffolds affected the swelling behavior, dynamic properties such as the storage moduli of the hydrogels as well as their degradation rates. Based on the subcutaneous implantation in rats, superporous hydrogel scaffolds induced the formation of thinner fibrous capsules around the implants and showed less inflammatory reaction, suggesting that the hydrogel scaffolds made from SIPS exhibited good cytocompatibility. The combined results of swelling ratio, porosity, physical strength and subcutaneous implant tests indicated that the superporous hydrogels with porosity > 50% showed potentials to be used for cornea periphery application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据