4.6 Review

NDM Metallo-β-Lactamases and Their Bacterial Producers in Health Care Settings

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00115-18

关键词

Acinetobacter; Enterobacteriaceae; NDM; carbapenem resistance; carbapenemase; metalloenzymes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81661130159, 81772233]
  2. Newton Advanced Fellowship, Royal Society, United Kingdom [NA150363]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) is a metallo-beta-lactamase able to hydrolyze almost all beta-lactams. Twenty-four NDM variants have been identified in >60 species of 11 bacterial families, and several variants have enhanced carbapenemase activity. Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coil are the predominant carriers of bla(NDM), with certain sequence types (STs) (for K. pneurnoniae, ST11, ST14, ST15, or ST147; for E. coil, ST167, ST410, or ST617) being the most prevalent. NDM-positive strains have been identified worldwide, with the highest prevalence in the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, and the Balkans. Most bla(NDM)-carrying plasmids belong to limited replicon types (IncX3, IncFII, or IncC). Commonly used phenotypic tests cannot specifically identify NDM. Lateral flow immunoassays specifically detect NDM, and molecular approaches remain the reference methods for detecting bla(NDM) Polymyxins combined with other agents remain the mainstream options of antimicrobial treatment. Compounds able to inhibit NDM have been found, but none have been approved for clinical use. Outbreaks caused by NDM-positive strains have been reported worldwide, attributable to sources such as contaminated devices. Evidence-based guidelines on prevention and control of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are available, although none are specific for NDM-positive strains. NDM will remain a severe challenge in health care settings, and more studies on appropriate countermeasures are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据