4.7 Article

CSF-ApoER2 fragments as a read-out of reelin signaling: Distinct patterns in sporadic and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer disease

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 490, 期 -, 页码 6-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.12.012

关键词

Reelin; ApoER2; Proteolytic fragment; CSF; Autosomal-dominant AD; Sporadic AD

资金

  1. EU BIOMARKAPD-Joint Programming on Neurodegenerative Diseases (JPND) project
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) [PI11/03026, PI15/00665, PI08/0036, PI12/00013, PI11/03023]
  3. Direccio General d'Universitat, Investigacio i Ciencia, GVA [AICO/2018/090]
  4. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER, Investing in your future)
  5. CIBERNED, ISCIII

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reelin is a glycoprotein associated with synaptic plasticity and neurotransmission. The malfunctioning of reelin signaling in the brain is likely to contribute to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Reelin binding to Apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2) activates downstream signaling and induces the proteolytic cleavage of ApoER2, resulting in the generation of soluble fragments. To evaluate the efficiency of reelin signaling in AD, we have quantified the levels of reelin and soluble ectodomain fragments of ApoER2 (ectoApoER2) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CSF from sporadic AD patients (sAD; n = 14, age 54-83 years) had lower levels of ectoApoER2 (similar to 31% reduction; p = .005) compared to those in the age-matched controls (n = 10, age 61-80), and a higher reelin/ecto-ApoER2 ratio. In contrast, autosomal dominant AD patients, carriers of PSEN1 mutations (ADAD; n = 7, age 31-49 years) had higher ecto-ApoER2 levels (similar to 109% increment; p = .001) and a lower reelin/ecto-ApoER2 ratio than the non-mutation carriers from the same families (n = 7, age 25-47 years). Our data suggest that the levels of ecto-ApoER2 in CSF could be a suitable read-out of an impaired reelin signaling in AD, but also indicate differences between sAD and ADAD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据