4.6 Article

Seasonal predictability of the tropical Indian Ocean SST in the North American multimodel ensemble

期刊

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
卷 53, 期 5-6, 页码 3361-3372

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-019-04709-0

关键词

Seasonal predictability; Indian Ocean Dipole mode; Indian Ocean Basin mode

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41530961, 41805066, 41621064]
  2. National Programme on Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction [GASI-IPOVAI-06]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, MNR [JB1804]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M632434]
  5. Canadian NSERC Discovery Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigate the predictability of the tropical Indian Ocean (TIO) sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTA) using the recently released North American Multimodel Ensemble dataset (NMME). We place emphasis on the predictability of two interannual variability modes: the Indian Ocean Basin mode (IOBM) and the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD). If defined by a 0.5 correlation skill, we find that the statistically skilful predictions correspond to an approximately 9- and 4-month lead for the two modes, respectively. We then applied a newly-developed predictability framework, i.e. Average Predictability Time method (APT), to explore the most potentially predictable mode (APT1) for the TIO SSTA. The derived APT1s correlate significantly to the IOBM and IOD, but are also characterised by several significant differences, which implies that there is a close link between the variability-related modes and the predictability-defined modes. Further analysis reveals that the predictability source of the IOBM-related APT1 originates from ENSO-induced thermocline variation over the southwest Indian Ocean, whereas wind-driven upwelling near Sumatra dominates IOD-related APT1. This study provides insights into the understanding of TIO SSTA predictability and offers a practical approach to obtain predictable targets to improve the TIO seasonal prediction skill.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据