4.5 Article

Burden of Implanted-Device-Detected Atrial High-Rate Episode Is Associated With Future Heart Failure Events - Clinical Significance of Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices -

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 83, 期 4, 页码 736-742

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1130

关键词

Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation; Atrial fibrillation; Atrial high-rate episodes; Cardiac implantable electronic devices; Heart failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The relationship between atrial high-rate episode (AHRE) burden (i.e., the frequency of atrial tachyarrhythmia) and heart failure (HF) risk is unclear. We hypothesized that new-onset and higher burden of AHRE are associated with HF. Methods and Results: We included 104 consecutive patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) capable of continuous atrial rhythm monitoring. Patients with AF history were excluded. To stratify patients, AHREs were evaluated only during the initial 1 year after CIED implantation. The primary endpoint was all-cause death or new-onset or worsening HF that required unplanned hospitalization or readjustment of HF drug therapy. At 1 year after CIED implantation, 34/104 patients (33%) exhibited AHREs. No difference in basal clinical characteristics except for left ventricular ejection fraction between patients with and without new-onset AHREs was found. AHRE groups had more HF events than the non-AHRE group. All patients were divided into 3 groups based on AHRE burden: none, low, and high. Worsening HF was observed in 12 patients (12%). Cox hazard analysis revealed that AHRE and higher AHRE burden were independent predictive factors for worsening HF. The high group showed a higher risk for HF than the non-AHRE groups, but no significant difference was found between the low-and non-AHRE groups. Conclusions: New-onset higher AHRE burden was associated with subsequent risk for HF in patients with CIEDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据